Gmail announces peer-to-peer money transfer service

By on February 16, 2015 in Blog, Google

Gmail users in the UK no longer need to reach for online banking card readers to transfer money to friends, since Google’s email service announced the launch of its own ‘send and request’ service.

All Gmail users aged 18 and over are able to use the free service, but will have to set up a Google Wallet Balance linked to their debit card or bank account. Once this is done, they’ll be able to send money to other users within a simple email.

[themecolor]Please find your money attached[/themecolor]

Attaching a payment is achieved in the same way as a document – via the attachment paperclip. To send money, a user hovers over the paperclip, clicks the ‘£’ icon, enters the amount they’d like to send, and then clicks send. Requesting money is a similar process, but instead of entering the amount you’d like to send, the field is left blank in order to turn it into a request.

Any money received or added into a Google Wallet Balance will remain there for future spending via transfers, on Google Play and other websites that accept the Google Wallet service. Alternatively, funds can be quickly transferred into the user’s bank account, reports have confirmed.

“People in the UK will now be able to quickly and securely send money to friends and family in the UK directly within desktop Gmail – even if the recipient doesn’t have a Gmail address,” Google stated.

The introduction of Google Wallet Balance positions the search engine giant as a firm rival to other peer-to-peer payment services, such as PayPal and Snapchat’s Snapcash feature. Social Media site Facebook is also rumoured to have a similar service in the pipeline.

It could also prove scary to banks, which will now have to improve their international transfer rates in order to avoid getting left behind.

Seamless Business Continuity at Collingwood Batchellor

By on February 1, 2015 in Case studies

Collingwood Batchellor are a surrey based family run homewares and furniture retailer operating across the South East area, with their flagship store based in Horley. Established with 90 employees delivering a high standard of customer service in 8 stores throughout the region, they require a reliable local outsourced IT service. M2 Computing have supported Collingwood Batchellor for over ten years, providing a complete IT and consultancy service. With each new store opening,M2 Computing managed the purchase and installation of the new equipment, infrastructure, cabling and system setup.

“M2 Computing has been our IT support provider for a number of years. As our company has grown, M2 has played a key part in the expansion and launch of new stores. I have great peace of mind knowing our disaster recovery is safely in M2’s hands.” Zena Morley, Accounts Manager

View Collingwood Batchellor Case Study

New tools for 2015

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, Company news

As complete techy nerds, we are very excited to kick start the New Year with a refreshed set of IT management tools. We are using the very latest versions of Kaseya and Autotask which make the process of looking after our clients’ IT systems far more efficient. Most of the new magic happens behind the scenes with updated monitoring checks and alerting, together with new service desk dashboards which empower the support department with clear information. One of the big bonuses is the new remote connection speed, which means our technical support team can link with clients instantly to address their personal computer issues.

Greg Roffe, Managing Director comments “It is very important to us that the team are armed with the very latest premium IT management tools to provide an improved service to our customers.”

Top Google search phrases of 2014

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, Google, Miscellaneous

The World Cup, Ebola and iPhone 6 were some of the most searched-for topics of 2014, according to Google.

The tech giant has revealed the biggest trends and news stories that UK users typed into its search engine over the course of 2014. Hot topics included the questions “Who is Banksy?”, “What is ALS?” and “How to crochet”.

It seems the UK was desperate to find out about smartphone game Flappy Bird, the Grand National and Malaysian Airlines, according to the data. News stories capturing attention included Ebola, as the top news story of the year, with the question “What is Ebola?” at the top of the ‘What is…’ list. Following the viral ice bucket challenge ALS came second in both categories.

The deaths of Peaches Geldof, Robin Williams and Rik Mayall featured in the top ten trending search lists for deaths, while Beyonce beat Jennifer Lawrence to the top spot for most searched-for female celebrity. Top of the male celebrities list was singer Ed Sheeran, followed in second by Jay Z.

[themecolor]Twerk, kiss or chrochet?[/themecolor]

Learning new skills was also sought after – with pertinent questions being asked on tasks such as how to twerk, squat, kiss and crochet. Meanwhile, geographic differences discovered that Londoners most wanted to know ‘how to kiss’, whereas those in Cardiff were more concerned with ‘how to draw’. Perhaps as a result of the renowned universities and colleges across the city, Oxford’s most common query was ‘how to paraphrase’.

Google’s Stephen Rosenthal said: “Google’s Year in Search gives us the best snapshot of what moved, inspired, shocked and intrigued us in 2014.

“With so many of us now having multiple computers, phones and tablets immediately to hand, these results are the most accurate and comprehensive collection of what the UK’s been talking about this year.”

[themecolor]View full results[/themecolor]

To explore the year 2014 in Google searches, click here

Britain’s biggest IT disasters in 2014

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, General, Topical

UK businesses strive all year round to protect their confidential data, implementing systems to keep cyber criminals at bay and avoid viruses and malware that would bring down their systems. Unfortunately, not all are successful and it’s the high-profile targets that attract the biggest headlines.

So let’s cast our eye back over some of the biggest IT disasters of the past 12 months, courtesy of the closely-watched annual ‘Hall of Shame’ from Original Software. This list of IT errors in the UK led to reputational damage for some red-faced company executives, causing disruption and reducing customer confidence. Make sure it is not your business in 2015!

[themecolor]The 2014 IT Disaster ‘Hall of Shame’[/themecolor]

Courtesy of Original Software’s annual ‘Hall of Shame’

  1. Amazon: The run up to Christmas proved rich pickings on the IT disaster front – Black Friday and Cyber Monday saw e-commerce sites buckling under the weight of fervent shopping (step forward Tesco, Topshop and Net a Porter) but the failure that caused the most angst and the biggest headlines was surely a problems with Amazon. A glitch in price comparison software saw thousands of products in Amazon’s Marketplace (most of which are supplied by small business owners) on sale for just one penny. Shoppers rushed in snapping up everything from electric toothbrushes to mobile phones for 1p. The problem is that many of these products were housed in Amazon’s behemoth warehouses and were shipped toute de suite. Amazon has said that it won’t provide compensation to small shopkeepers and many have lost money, one to the tune of £100,000.
  2. NATS: The year wouldn’t be complete without a monumental travel tech meltdown and 2014 was true to form when a glitch in the NATS system saw 10,000 passengers experiencing cancellations or heavy delays on one of the busiest travel weekends in the run up to Christmas. The struggles of the air traffic control system was apparently down to one line of code that caused a failure that affected thousands of passengers.
  3. UK Border Agency and the immigration system: this was probably one of the biggest tech shambles of 2014, when in October, IT failures were found to add up to a breathtaking £1 billion of wasted tax payers’ money and 50,000 rejected asylum seekers were said to be unaccounted for. The Commons Public Accounts Committee also found that 11,000 asylum seekers had been waiting for seven years to find out whether they could stay in Britain and they still hadn’t resolved 29,000 applications dating back to 2007. PAC said the system was in chaos and a new backlog is building up. Government IT failures of this nature play into the hands of opposing political parties and anger tax payers who foot the bill.
  4. HMRC’s faulty tax payments: the UK’s government tax agency again hit the headlines this year when a systems error was blamed for erroneous tax calculations for up to 5 million people. It meant that thousands of people were mistakenly sent rebate cheques – many of which have been spent – that HMRC needed to recoup. Again, this is further reputational damage for a department already dogged by problems.
  5. BBC’s Digital Media Initiative (DMI): again, this is a project that was ongoing for a few years, but it deserves an entry in the 2014 Hall of Shame because in April this year, a report found that the Beeb was “too complacent” in its handling of the DMI, a project which aimed to move the broadcaster away from using and storing video tape through the production of new editing tools, an online archive of programmes and a new database. The BBC spent a colossal £125.9 million on the project, which was scrapped after serious failings in planning and management. The Beeb says that it recouped £27.5 million of that, but that meant they still wasted almost £100 million of license payers’ money on a project that never saw the light of day.
  6. eDreams: the funny tale of a website glitch that saw an eager holiday maker charged £23.7 billion for a return flight with a low cost airline when she tried to book a Spanish getaway in September this year. This significant overcharge was in all likelihood down to a data validation glitch and was a signal to eDreams that it needs to tighten up its testing processes. Again, the main damage with this screw-up was was to eDreams’s brand – and the negative headlines were a blow to shareholders.
  7. Screwfix.com: online DIY retailer Screwfix.com made headlines in February this year when everything on its website – from sheds and ride on mowers, to power tools and kitchen appliances – were listed for the bargain basement price of £34.99. As you can imagine, word spread like wildfire on social media and shoppers piled on to the site to snap up bargains. Once it realized the error – which was probably caused by a data validation issue – Screwfix was forced to cancel orders, which went down poorly with customers. And the reputational fall-out wasn’t exactly welcomed by its investors.
  8. NHS patient booking system: in May of this year, the NHS was hit by another tech failure as it was forced to scrap its online outpatients’ appointment system. A decision has been taken to replace it with a potentially more costly e-referral system. GPs were meant to use Choose & Book – which has cost over £350 million since its inception 2004 – to assign appointment slots, but many hated using it and it was accused of being error ridden and tricky to use. The system was “dropped quietly” in the spring with patients and tax payers once again, being the ones who lose out.
  9. RBS/Natwest/Ulster Bank: this is a tech failure that happened in 2012, but in November 2014, the bank was fined £56 million by the FCA following a lengthy investigation into the incident, which froze millions of customers out of their accounts, rendered ATMs useless and transfers and digital banking services were blocked. Thousands of companies were unable to make payroll commitments. The problems endured for three weeks. The FCA report found that risk management and control failings were to blame, rather than a lack of investment in IT or the banks’ legacy system architecture. Whatever the cause, customers were furious and RBS’s reputation took a hit.

Colin Armitage, CEO of Original Software, a software quality technology company, commented: “Our 2014 Hall of Shame shows that tech disasters, system screw-ups and software glitches are still very much a part of the modern IT landscape. And they rarely go unnoticed. Customers, employees and shareholders can all be badly affected by disruptions in service and as a result, the organisation takes a big reputational hit. Again this goes to show that defect detection, quality assurance and testing have to move up the corporate agenda – failings in these areas can have massive consequences for the business.”

Lizard Squad ruins gamers’ Christmas with DDoS attack

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, Security

Millions of gamers were not able to play online over the Christmas period, thanks to a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS) on the gaming networks of both PlayStation and Xbox, instigated by hacking group Lizard Squad.

Anyone who received an Xbox One or PS4 for Christmas was unable to get online on Christmas Day, after huge amounts of fake traffic were sent to Microsoft’s and PlayStation’s networks, causing them to crash. This meant gamers couldn’t play certain games, access the services’ online stores or download anything to their consoles.

Microsoft managed to resurrect its service fairly quickly, and Xbox Live was back up and running within a few days, but PlayStation’s network, which has more than double the number of subscribers, was still suffering during the first weekend after Christmas.

[themecolor]What is a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack?[/themecolor]

A distributed denial of service attack is a strategy used by hackers to render targets inaccessible by flooding them with huge volumes of online traffic. In non-cyber terms, it would be like somebody repeatedly dialling your telephone in order to keep your line busy and prevent you from making a call.

To continue with this analogy, the ‘distributed’ aspect would be achieved if your telephone number was then passed on to hundreds of other people who also attempted to ring you.

[themecolor]Why did they do it?[/themecolor]

A hacker who claimed to be a member of Lizard Squad said the attacks were orchestrated partly for amusement, but also because it wished to demonstrate weaknesses in the company’s systems.

This is not the first time PlayStation has been attacked by this particular hacking group. Lizard Squad claims to have taken down the network several times – it even tweeted a terrorism threat to an airline when PlayStation’s president of online entertainment was onboard one of its planes.

Sony Pictures, another branch of Sony, was also hacked in late 2014. However, the two attacks are unrelated; the Sony Pictures attack was much more sophisticated, as the perpetrators stole confidential information. DDoS attacks alone do not tend to end in data being stolen; instead the service or website is simply taken down for a period of time.

After ceasing its Christmas attack on Xbox and PlayStation, Lizard Squad went on to target Tor, a secure network which allows people to communicate anonymously.

New study highlights importance of hardware upgrades

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, General

It can happen to the best of us. A new study reveals that the majority of IT professionals have fallen victim to hardware failure, with many instances causing data loss and downtime. Furthermore some are warning this problem is being exacerbated by delays in upgrading hardware.

Carried out by research company Vanson Bourne, a survey was answered by more than 3,300 IT workers across the world. Sixty-six per cent of those asked said they’d been let down by equipment in the past – worryingly, this is 19 per cent higher than in 2011.

Of those who had experienced failures, 35 per cent said they’d completely lost power, while others had suffered a range of minor issues. It’s the consequences of these issues that most will be worried about, however.

[themecolor]1 in 3 hardware failures resulted in lost revenue[/themecolor]

More than a third (34 per cent) of the respondents said their hardware failures had resulted in lost revenue, with 54 per cent claiming staff productivity had been impacted in some way.  Customer relationships have also been damaged for many of those questioned, with 29 per cent saying loyalty had been noticeably affected.

Data loss is obviously a major concern for most IT-dependent enterprises, and the study – sponsored by computing firm EMC – does little to dispel this idea. The majority of the professionals asked (71 per cent) said they were not confident in their ability to recover data, or even the failed systems themselves.

EMC president Gary Churchward says he can see why some businesses are struggling.

In a statement, he explained: “With 62 percent of IT decision-makers interviewed feeling challenged to protect hybrid cloud, big data and mobile, it’s understandable that almost all of them lack the confidence that data protection will be able to meet future business challenges.”

In total, the study estimated the annual costs of the failures to be somewhere in the region of £1.1 trillion. Downtime and data loss cost businesses £626 billion and £495 billion respectively, Vanson Bourne suggests.

Microsoft readying new web browser

By on January 15, 2015 in Blog, Microsoft, Product releases

After being the subject of Internet Explorer-based ridicule for a number of years, Microsoft is set to release a brand new web browser to compete with the likes of Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome, according to reports this month.

The program, which is being developed under the code name ‘Spartan’, will be Microsoft’s first new attempt at a browser since Internet Explorer – or IE – was first released almost two decades ago as part of the Windows 95 operating system.

[themecolor]IE market share falls to 1 in 5[/themecolor]

While Internet Explorer was the world’s most popular web browser for a number of years, it was overtaken by Google Chrome in 2012 and has since been widely criticised by the tech world for a range of issues related to its poor performance when compared to its major competitors.

As of November 2014, just one fifth of the world’s internet users surf the web on a version of IE, as compared to 52 per cent for Google Chrome. Now with Satya Nadella scheduled to give a keynote speech on Windows 10, speculation is building around the possibility that Spartan will be officially unveiled officially at the event on January 21.

In an interview on the topic, the Microsoft CEO said: “Productivity is the only thing that matters for the individual, the organisation or the entire economy. The core driver of the use of technology is to create fulfilment in individual lives and drive economic gain for entire companies and entire economies.”

Interestingly, Spartan is not expected to replace Internet Explorer, but will instead be shipped alongside the latest version – IE11 – on desktop and mobile machines running Windows 10. It is not known whether the program will be made available on other major platforms – like iOS, OS X or Google’s Android system.

Prospective users can expect to see a number of new features included with Spartan, included an annotation tool and the ability to group tabs.

MEPs overwhelmingly support Google breakup

By on December 11, 2014 in Blog, Google

Internet search companies like Google should be broken up, the European parliament has suggested. Members of the European parliament (MEPs) have said that action needs to be taken to ensure that search engines are detached from other services provided by internet companies.

No specific search engine company was mentioned, but Google is thought to hold 90 per cent of the market share in Europe. Although politicians don’t currently have the power to break up companies like Google, the vote has put pressure on European regulators to take action against the firm.

The vote came as part of the European Commission’s continuing investigation into Google, after rivals lodged an anti-competitive case against the Internet giant in 2010.

They asked for four areas to be investigated, including the way Google copies content from other sites to use it within its own services and how it displays its own search services compared with competitors’ products.

[themecolor]Action unlikely due to lack of precedent[/themecolor]

EU competition commissioner, Margrethe Vestager, who has inherited the case, will make the final decision after her predecessor, Joaquin Almunia, failed to reach a settlement. He believed that the only solution would be a fine of up to $5 billion (around £3.19 billion).

Politicians are keen to find a solution, but many experts think that it’s unlikely the Commission will order the breakup of Google, as it has never ordered any other company to do so before.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association has criticised the idea of a break-up, calling the solution “extreme and unworkable”. It claimed the Commission is suggesting that all search companies should have their businesses separated, which is an unreasonable thing to ask in a rapidly changing online market.

An EU data protection group also recently said that the ‘right to be forgotten’ law should be expanded further to include .com domains.

More than 50 sites added to piracy blacklist

By on December 11, 2014 in Blog, Security

The UK High Court has added 53 new sites to the piracy blacklist, more than doubling the number of blocked sites.

Now, some 93 sites have been officially blocked, including Rapid Moviez, Warez BB, Sumotorrent, Torrentfunk, Torrentz, watchseries.It, BitSoup, Isohunt, Stream TV, IP Torrents, Tor Movies and Torrentdb. The sites themselves do not host the illegal material, they only provide download links to pirated software, films, TV shows, e-books and music. This means that blocking the sites does not remove the illegal content from the web, it just makes it harder for people to find.

The court decision came after the Motion Picture Association (MPA) made a complaint that was uncontested by internet service providers, as they no longer wanted to defend themselves in court.

Chris Marcich, president and managing director of the MPA in Europe, believes that ordering ISPs to block certain sites is an effective way to tackle the issue of online copyright infringement. He added that the law targets sites that aim to make a profit from stolen content and don’t contribute anything to the economy in return.

BT is one of the first ISPs to block the newly banned sites, with O2, Virgin, Sky, TalkTalk and EE expected to follow suit soon.

Although the first restrictions began back in 2012, this latest court order is the first to block private torrent sites, which only make the download links to illegal content available to members. TorrentDay.com, BitSoup.me and IPTorrents.com are examples of the private sites recently put on the blacklist by the High Court. The Pirate Bay was the very first torrent site to be outlawed under changes made to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act in 2012.